What is a radical feminist analysis?

So far my favorite definition is found on the about page for the magazine, Rain and Thunder, and follows:

 A radical feminist perspective is one that is aware that:

• men, as a class, are waging a war against women

• rape, battering, incest, prostitution, pornography, poverty, heterosexuality, and gynocide are some of the main instruments of male supremacy

• all forms of hierarchy and domination, including misogyny, racism, classism, ableism, ageism, and every other interconnected oppression, must be opposed

• we must strive to eradicate domination and subordination from our personal lives and sexual practices

• organized, political resistance is necessary to make change in our local communities and the world

 I have posted this and sent this out to countless people on tumblr. The feedback was mostly, "Okay, but wtf does this mean?"

This means that radical feminism is based in class analysis. Classes are social categories that generalize experiences which, in turn, shape the identities that are used by or placed upon people in order to categorize a common narrative, including the expectations placed upon that class in society. This does not mean that every narrative in the class is the same nor that the individual will even be aware of their placement in said class. Example: A person with a late-in-life disability that is invisible to an outsider may not face the same economic disparages and street harassment that a person with a born advisability may face, despite being in the same class. There still may be cases that the person with the born disability be in a higher economic class than the person with the late in life disability, but it would seem ridiculous to say that because of that example all services and aid should be shut off to people with born disabilities. A class analysis mediates the group and gives a social scientist a base number to work from. 

Radical feminism also revolves around the idea that "woman" is a class label applied to those who are female, or have an inter-sex condition and assigned to be female, from birth. From this idea stems the roles and expectations that to women and were created to keep women as a "second-class" to men. 

Women as a class are oppressed by men, the system that has set this up is called Patriarchy. The system of patriarchy operates through the disproportionate leadership status on men, characterized by casting all women as naturally unsuited to lead men, because of their birth-given role of femininity. Not all men benefit from patriarchy,  however those men are still ranked above women, this does not mean that some women (by virtue of lineage/wealth) do not have concrete advantages and social privileges compared to some men but they still face the effects of patriarchy. 

From birth women are taught the female role for whatever culture they belong in and that they are still below men. They are trained into beauty practices that harm them, told that they are expected to be impregnated one day, and taught that other women are not to be sexually desired by other women, that it is not so much if, but a when you will be sexually abused by a male. We receive all these messages and are told that the natural consequences are rape, (because you drank too much or dressed the wrong way, and deserve to be punished), battering (because you just didn't do what your man expected from you), poverty (because men deserve jobs and your role is to be a mother) ect. These messages are what create the condition of "womanhood" under patriarchy. 

The object of radical feminism is to address the root of all social disparity, which radical feminism addresses as patriarchy. This means that  misogyny, racism, classism, ableism, ageism, are all parts that uphold patriarchy. This is where inter-sectionalism is important, and has long been a criticism of radical feminism. This understandable that women, for example dealing with racism, that problem becomes so big, that all of their focus goes towards resolving that, while patriarchy is maintained. Women have to work together to break apart all forms of oppression, especially those of whom do not have added class oppression, to help those who do. 

Within our personal lives we need to live within a framework of radical feminism, and with the expectation that our personal actions are inter-connected with "woman-hood" as a whole. Critics of sexual practices and behaviors are not individualized, nor are those actions. When practices like, pornography are defended because "I like it for personal use", you are saying that you do not care that women in porn are raped, that pornography results in women being objectified, that women's sexuality should be marketed for the male gaze, and that you do not care about the rampant abuse and torture that is often showcased in pornography. A radical feminist analysis requires that an individual look into their actions without a cognitive dissonance to their beliefs. 

Lastly, as radical feminists we are required to take action to change the systems that we recognize. that we dismantle structures that are harmful to females, and that we break free of roles that are place upon us by our society.